Galaxy Battles II: Emerging Worlds

Major Dota 2 Tournament in Galaxy Battles series

Total buybacks: 103

Highest averages | Draft | Positions ☰ | Summary | Profiles ☰

Remove low matches (6) Remove low Core Safelane (3) Remove low Core Midlane (3) Remove low Core Offlane (3) Remove low Core Jungle (1) data_filter_positions_0.0_mp

		Core Safelane				Core Midlane				Core Offlane				Core Jungle				Support
Player	Mtchs	Mtchs	Rank	Ratio	WR	Mtchs	Rank	Ratio	WR	Mtchs	Rank	Ratio	WR	Mtchs	Rank	Ratio	WR	Mtchs	Rank	Ratio	WR
VGJ.T.Kamma -	11	4	100.0	36.4%	100.0%	7	89.5	63.6%	57.1%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
VGJ.T.Sylar -	11	4	85.7	36.4%	75.0%	4	100.0	36.4%	100.0%	3	66.7	27.3%	33.3%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
VGJ.T.Yang -	11	4	71.4	36.4%	50.0%	-	-	-	-	7	100.0	63.6%	85.7%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
VGJ.T.Ayo -	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	100.0	100.0%	72.7%
VGJ.T.Fade -	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	100.0	100.0%	72.7%
EG.MISERY -	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	88.9	100.0%	66.7%
EG.Cr1t- -	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	88.9	100.0%	66.7%
EG.SumaiL -	9	5	76.2	55.6%	60.0%	3	94.7	33.3%	100.0%	1	27.8	11.1%	0.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EG.Fear -	9	2	95.2	22.2%	100.0%	5	73.7	55.6%	40.0%	2	88.9	22.2%	100.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EG.rtz -	9	2	57.1	22.2%	50.0%	1	68.4	11.1%	100.0%	6	83.3	66.7%	66.7%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
TSpirit.Biver -	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	100.0	12.5%	0.0%	7	77.8	87.5%	71.4%
TSpirit.DkPhobos -	8	1	23.8	12.5%	0.0%	-	-	-	-	7	94.4	87.5%	71.4%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
TSpirit.iLTW -	8	1	61.9	12.5%	100.0%	7	89.5	87.5%	57.1%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
TSpirit.IllidanSTR -	8	6	90.5	75.0%	66.7%	1	68.4	12.5%	100.0%	1	27.8	12.5%	0.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
TSpirit.Fng -	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	72.2	100.0%	62.5%
OG.7Mad- -	7	2	33.3	28.6%	0.0%	5	78.9	71.4%	60.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
OG.Fly -	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	66.7	100.0%	42.9%
OG.JerAx -	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	66.7	100.0%	42.9%
OG.Resolut1on -	7	4	85.7	57.1%	75.0%	2	21.1	28.6%	0.0%	1	27.8	14.3%	0.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
OG.KheZu -	7	1	23.8	14.3%	0.0%	-	-	-	-	6	77.8	85.7%	50.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
BrX.PG.BrX.BrishBrish.Predato -	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	50.0	100.0%	33.3%
BrX.PG.BrX.Lesserbluee.DxRace -	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	50.0	100.0%	33.3%
BrX.PG.Brx.bfl.RingerHut -	6	3	52.4	50.0%	33.3%	-	-	-	-	3	66.7	50.0%	33.3%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
BrX.PG.BrX.ShinymF.Sades -	6	-	-	-	-	6	47.4	100.0%	33.3%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
BrX.ramz? -	6	3	52.4	50.0%	33.3%	-	-	-	-	3	66.7	50.0%	33.3%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
paiN.tavo -	5	-	-	-	-	1	68.4	20.0%	100.0%	4	38.9	80.0%	25.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
paiN.Kingrd -	5	-	-	-	-	1	68.4	20.0%	100.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	27.8	80.0%	25.0%
paiN.veronica -	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	55.6	100.0%	40.0%
paiN.hFn k3 -	5	4	71.4	80.0%	50.0%	1	15.8	20.0%	0.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
paiN.w33 -	5	1	23.8	20.0%	0.0%	3	36.8	60.0%	33.3%	1	72.2	20.0%	100.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
TNC.Tims -	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	27.8	100.0%	25.0%
TNC.SamH -	4	-	-	-	-	1	15.8	25.0%	0.0%	3	66.7	75.0%	33.3%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
TNC.1437 -	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	27.8	100.0%	25.0%
TNC.Kuku^ -	4	1	23.8	25.0%	0.0%	2	42.1	50.0%	50.0%	1	27.8	25.0%	0.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
TNC.Raven -	4	3	52.4	75.0%	33.3%	1	15.8	25.0%	0.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Skyville .`JL -	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	38.9	100.0%	33.3%
Skyville .Skyville.Efking*** -	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	38.9	100.0%	33.3%
Infamous.Masoku -	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	11.1	100.0%	0.0%
Skyville .JG `y -	3	-	-	-	-	3	36.8	100.0%	33.3%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Skyville .qwe -	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	66.7	100.0%	33.3%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Infamous.p4pita -	3	-	-	-	-	3	26.3	100.0%	0.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Infamous.Old StngR -	3	1	23.8	33.3%	0.0%	-	-	-	-	2	33.3	66.7%	0.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Infamous.+++ -	3	2	33.3	66.7%	0.0%	-	-	-	-	1	27.8	33.3%	0.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Skyville .123 -	3	3	52.4	100.0%	33.3%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Infamous.Scofield -	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	11.1	100.0%	0.0%

This section contains stats for players' performance on various positions. Positions are determined based on players performance (core or support) and lane. Supports across all lanes (including roamers) are considered as one role. Lanes and positions may not be accurate.